| Database: PFC_ID: Apache Sitgreaves NF: District: Topographic Quad1: Topographic Quad2: Topographic Quad3: Riparian-Wetland Area Name: Date: ID Team Observers: HUC5: Miles: Area Name: Flight Line: , Photo No: , Photo Year: PFC Reach Number: Stream Name: Stream Type: Riparian Width (in feet): |
MySQL 1502000101_Nutrioso_Creek_4_05/10/2005 Alpine RD Nutrioso, 281NW, H233109 EC Bar Ranch Reach 4 October 5, 2005 Tom Subirge, Jim Crosswhite Nutrioso Creek 0.61 EC Bar Ranch Reach 4 4 Nutrioso Creek Perennial 80 |
| Riparian Species List: sedge Carex aquatilus, rush Juncus
balticus, Bluestem willow? or strapleaf willow, mint, horsetail Equisitum,
rabbitbrush Chna (dying), Bebbs willow Salix bebbiana, cattails, Bulrush Upland Species List: rabbitbrush Chna, skunkbush Rhtr, blue grama Bogr2, spike muhly, squirreltail Sihy, juniper Jumo, globe mallow, Iris, Indian paintbrush, 4-wing saltbush, Louisiana wormwood Arlu, rose Rosa, little bluestem Anba |
|
Location
Location Description: Reach
Downstream
End Point
Township Range Section:
Meridian: Gila & Salt River Base Line
Township: 7N, Range:
30E, Section: 20, 1/4: SE, 1/4 1/4: NW
UTM: Zone:12S
Northing: meters,
Easting: meters
Lat / Long:
North Latitude: Degrees: , Decimal Minutes:
West Longitude: Degrees: , Decimal Minutes:
Upstream
End Point
Township Range Section:
Meridian: Gila & Salt River Base Line
Township:7N, Range:30E,
Section: 20, 1/4: SE, 1/4 1/4: SW
UTM: Zone:12S
Northing: meters,
Easting: meters
Lat / Long:
North Latitude: Degrees: , Decimal Minutes:
West Longitude: Degrees: , Decimal Minutes:
HYDROLOGIC
1) Floodplain inundated in "relatively frequent"
events (1-3 years) YES
Remarks: Flood
plain 100% vegetated with sedges and rushes, spongy and saturated soil, Chna
dying out. Flood plain appears inundated frequently.
2) Active/stable beaver dams YES
Remarks: Mud dams,
some larger ponds with bulrush.
3) Sinuosity, width/depth ration, and gradient are in
balance with the landscape setting (i.e., landform, geology, and bioclimatic
region) YES
Remarks: Sinuosity
very good, channel width/depth ratio varies with beaver dams and how much water
is present, this reach can dry up, gradient very low.
4) Riparian zone is widening or has achieved potiential
extent YES
Remarks: Achieved
potential, few raw banks left. There are subtle indications that flood plain
building processes are still occurring, meaning the riparian zone is still
widening.
5) Upland watershed not contributin to riparian
degradation YES
Remarks: Upland
watershed conditions do not contribute to riparian degradation, however not all
of upper watershed is in desired condition. Some private lands not in as stable
condition as desired, erosive and unstable geologic formation (Datil, volcanic
ash), road density of old (now stable) logging roads.
VEGETATIVE
6) Diverse age-class distribution (recruitment for
maintenance/recovery YES
Remarks: Herbaceous
wet meadow vegetation type (Saex, tolerant of fine grained saturated soils).
Community is considered diverse in age-class.
7) Diverse composition of vegetation (for
maintenance/recovery YES
Remarks: High
diversity of native species. Efforts
have been made to eliminate non-native species (Russian olive and sow
thistles).
8) Species present indicate maintenance of riparian soil
moisture characteristics YES
Remarks: Vegetation
community consists of obligate and facultative wetland species.
9) Streambank vegetation is comprised of those plants or
plant communities that have root masses capable of withstanding high streamflow
events YES
Remarks: Yes: Carex
and Juncus.
10) Riparian plants exhibit high vigor YES
Remarks: 3-4 ft
growth of herbaceous species.
11) Adequate vegetative cover present to protect banks and
dissipate energy during high flows YES
Remarks: No bare
spots on flood plain soils, even in areas of recent deposition.
12) Plant communities in the riparian area are an adequate
source of coarse and/or large woody debris
YES
Remarks: Lentic
system - few woodies needed, some are present.
SOILS
13) Floodplain and channel characteristics (i.e., rocks,
overflow channels, coarse and/or large woody debris) adequate to dissipate
energy YES
Remarks: Little
stream flow energy left, wide meanders and spacious floodplains effective in
dissipating energy.
14) Point bars are revegetating YES
Remarks: 100% veg
cover on all depositional areas.
15) Lateral stream movement is associated with natural
sinuosity YES
Remarks: Natural
sinuosity forming processes still occurring .
16) System is vertically stable YES
Remarks: System is
slowly aggrading, no headcutting present. Beaver dams are present which also
trap sediment. Beaver ponds vegetated with bulrush.
17) Stream is in balance with the water and sediment being
supplied by the watershed (i.e., no excessive erosion or deposition) YES
Remarks: Channel
bottom and flood plain is building up, however is in balance with vegetation
growth. No bare soil areas present.
Vegetation Community Types:
Upland: Pied/Jude2/Jumo
Wetland:
Summary Determination
Functional Rating:
PFC
Trend for Functional -- At Risk: Unanswered
Are factors contributing to unacceptable conditions
outside agency's control or management? Y
If yes, what are those factors? Flow Regulations, Other,
Problem(s): FLow regulations pertaining to irrigation.
No particular
problems.
NOTES:
Bank swallows ? present and nesting in vertical bank cavities.
PHOTOS:
TS 36 thru 45
Recommendations: None. Present trends are adequate.
Riparian
acres in Reach 4: approximately 27 acres.
Time to fix: 0
Desired Functional Condition: At DFC: tending towards wet meadow system,
more flow would help, but irrigation dams retain peak flows (Rogers Reservoir,
Jarvis Reservoir, Nutrioso Reservoir - all upstream, Nelson Reservoir -
downstream).
Photographs: 9
Reach 4: #36-45
![]() |
![]() |
| 36 | 37 |
![]() |
![]() |
| 38 | 39 |
![]() |
![]() |
| 40 | 41 |
![]() |
|
| 42 |
#36 - 37: Panorama of views of Nutrioso Creek from observation tower near upper end of reach 4. Note width of floodplain and width of riparian area. 36 shows upstream view to south. 37 shows terrace and riparian area to southeast. 38 views towards the south-south-west with west terrace. 39 views to the southwest with Nutrioso Creek in foreground. 40 view towards northwest showing narrowing of riparian width. 41 view to the north with east terrace. 42 shows view to north-north-east with east terrace.

#43 - Downstream view of Reach 4 with dense coyote willow growth developing on the point bar, while channel is inundated with rushes. This type of channel condition is very efficient in trapping sediment and immobilizing it with vegetation. "A "Living Wall" erosion control structure was constructed by Mr. Crosswhite using haybales anchored in place with plastic fence material to shift the channel away from the incised bank and allow willows to be planted to help prevent over 100 tons of soil entering the stream each year."

#44 - Downstream channel view of Reach 4. Note rushes inundate the channel, and a small patch of cattails is visible in the distance. Vertical terrace banks are still need to stabilize and floodplain could also be wider.

#45 - View of a beaver pond at lower end of Reach 4. Note rushes are inhabiting the ponded area, further helping to stabilize sediment and narrowing the channel. Water is near stagnant, however is still cloudy from suspended sediment, which is too fine to settle out. This is a function of the area's geology composed of volcanic ash (Datil formation). Some of this turbidity can still be reduced after all vertical banks have stabilized and optimum floodplain width has been achieved, however a given level of natural background turbidity is expected to remain.